Comparative Clinical Study of Port-closure Techniques Following Laparoscopic Surgery

Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1996;183(4):335-344.

uplift surgical pearls Download the clinical study results

Background

Recently, a number of laparoscopic port-closure techniques have been reported to avoid the complications associated with the port-closure after laparoscopic surgery. To evaluate these port-closure techniques, we compared seven new laparoscopic port-closure techniques with the standard technique of a hand-sutured closure.

Study Design

In a prospective randomized study, 95, 12-mm port sites in 32 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures were randomized to one of eight different port-site closure techniques.

The port-closure techniques included:

  • The Carter-Thomas Needle-Point Suture Passer
  • Maciol suture needle set
  • eXit Disposable Puncture Closure device
  • Endoclose suture carrier
  • Tahoe Surgical Instruments Ligature device, a long 14-gauge angiocatheter with looped polypropylene suture
  • Lowsley retractor with hand-sutured closure, and the standard technique of hand-sutured closure

We evaluated the time, the security, and the auxiliary instrumentation required for each closure.

Results

Of the port-closure techniques, the Carter-Thomason device was faster overall, resulted in fewer port-closure related complications and provided leak proof closure.

Conclusion

The Carter-Thomason device is our preferred method for the closure of port sites after laparoscopic surgery.



© Copyright 2003 - 2006 Inlet Medical, Inc., a CooperSurgical Company
All rights reserved.
Legal Notices & Trademarks | Trademark & Copyright Policies | Disclaimer | Site Map
page last revised: Nov 29, 2006